Drawing for INTERPULS

USPTO serial 79046975

INTERPULS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3499397Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 9, 2008
Examiner
CORWIN, CHARLOTTE K
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTERPULS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary C. Bonnema

Mary C. Bonnema McGarry Bair PC45 Ottawa SW, Suite 700Grand Rapids, MI 49503UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Parts of milking machines, namely, pneumatic pulsators, individual electronic pulsators, solenoid valves, grippers, clusters, transparent covers made of stainless steel, mugs made of stainless steel, supports made of stainless steel for milk filters, sanitary traps, vacuum regulators, automatic disconnection systems comprised of a vacuum cylinder, control valves, flow sensors, an electronic control panel, a microprocessor and a power unitSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 20, 2023DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Nov 20, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 16, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Aug 16, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Aug 16, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 31, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Aug 14, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 14, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 28, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Apr 14, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 7, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 7, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 10, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 9, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 24, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 4, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 16, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 16, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 16, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 13, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 13, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 13, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 24, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 24, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 8, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 8, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 8, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 7, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 21, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2007SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance