Drawing for OBSESSED

USPTO serial 79047071

OBSESSED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRODY, DANIEL S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OBSESSED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Travelling bags; articles of luggage; bags; cases; holdalls; rucksacks; haversacks; pouches; handbags; shopping bags; school bags; briefcases; document cases; pocket wallets; pursesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 1, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 27, 2017CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 27, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2014CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 3, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Dec 18, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 11, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 1, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 11, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 28, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 28, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 1, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 1, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 21, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 25, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 25, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 23, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 22, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 31, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance