USPTO serial 79047116
THOMAS HARDY & SONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRIFFIN, JAMES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THOMAS HARDY & SONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2025 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2023 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 22, 2015 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 28, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 28, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 26, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 21, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |