Drawing for FLOATMAXX

USPTO serial 79047162

FLOATMAXX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAKHDOOM, SAIMA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLOATMAXX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals for industrial purposes, particularly Epsom salt; high purity salt for the pharmaceutical industry, included in this classSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
003Soaps, perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions; bath salt for cosmetic purposesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
005Pharmaceutical preparations as well as dietetic substances for medical use, particularly high purity saltSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 31, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 30, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 28, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 31, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 30, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 11, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 28, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 28, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 2, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 30, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 15, 2008RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 22, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 22, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 10, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 9, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 31, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 31, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance