Drawing for KING-CARE

USPTO serial 79047178

KING-CARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3647650Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 30, 2009
Examiner
SHARMA, NAPOLEON
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KING-CARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ronald E. Shapiro

Ronald E. Shapiro Shapiro and Silverstein PLLC11350 Random Hills Road, Suite 740Fairfax, VA 22030UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004LEATHER AND IMITATION LEATHER PRESERVING OILS AND GREASESSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 9, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 6, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 6, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 30, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 28, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 28, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 14, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 14, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 27, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 7, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 7, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 30, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 30, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 12, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 28, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 28, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 14, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 25, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 11, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 10, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 19, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 19, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 30, 2008ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 30, 2008LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Oct 17, 2008LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 23, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 12, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 12, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 5, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 4, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 5, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 5, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 5, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 4, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 2, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 31, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance