Drawing for LIVING BUILDINGS

USPTO serial 79047182

LIVING BUILDINGS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIVING BUILDINGS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Barry L. Kelmachter

Barry L. Kelmachter Bachman & LaPointe, PC900 Chapel Street, Suite 1201New Haven, CT 06510-2802UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Consultancy services relating to energy efficiency in buildings; consultancy services relating to energy consumption and energy management; consultancy services relating to the environmental quality of buildings, namely, environmental assessment and compliance; provision of information, advice and consultancy regarding compliance with the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD); surveying services; building inspection services; engineering surveys of building condition; environmental monitoring services, namely, monitoring of air and soil quality; monitoring of air quality within buildings; engineering surveys of property and audits to assess energy requirements and potential energy efficiency and energy savings; preparation of environmental compliance reportsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 9, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jun 8, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 21, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 10, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 10, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 11, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 10, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 4, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 8, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 8, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 7, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 7, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 4, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 4, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 12, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 28, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 28, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 3, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 3, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 18, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 18, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 2008CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 29, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 14, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 12, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 12, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 21, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 26, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 26, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 26, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 25, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 31, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance