USPTO serial 79047193
TOPGUARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TOPGUARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | Industrial oils and greases; lubricants; dust absorbing, wetting and binding compositions; fuels (including motor spirit) and illuminants; candles and wicks for lighting | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Machines and machine tools; motors and engines (except for land vehicles), including for air vehicles and water vehicles; machine coupling and transmission components (except for land vehicles), including for air vehicles and water vehicles; agricultural implements, other than hand-operated; incubators for eggs; filters, being parts of machines or engines, including fuel filters, oil filters and air filters | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Vehicles; apparatus for transportation by land, air or water; parts for vehicles (not included in other classes), particularly engines and transmission components for land vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2009 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | IROP | IRREGULARITY ON NOTICE OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 28, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 28, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 29, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |