USPTO serial 79047199
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines for production of pipes, consisting of plastic and metal to be used for drainage areas, for canal and waste water drainage systems, for cable protection, for air-conditioning and ventilation systems, and for construction and building of chimneys, and structural parts and fittings therefor; Machine tools, namely, clamps for use in the precision clamping of work pieces, and structural parts and fittings therefor; machines for production for tubings made of plastic by blast extrusion process | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | Plastic tubes and pipe systems consisting, namely, of non-metallic flexible hoses and pipes for use in the convoluted tubing industry, insulated pipe supports, insulation jackets for industrial pipes, non-metal pipe couplings and joints, non-metal pipe collars, non-metal tubing and tubing couplings for joining and terminating pipes, pipe gaskets, joint packing for non-metallic flexible pipes, junctions not of metal for non-metallic flexible pipes; plastic tube fittings, namely, unions, reducers, tees, male connectors, caps and plugs for automotive, telecommunications, appliances, swimming pools, medical, marine, electrical conduit and fittings, robotics cable protection systems, mass transit, and custom use, namely, for manufacturing of corrugating equipment and tooling; plastic tube tie-ups, namely, unions, reducers, tees, male connectors, caps and plugs for automotive, telecommunications, appliances, swimming pools, medical, marine, electrical conduit and fittings, robotics cable protection systems, mass transit, and custom use, namely, for manufacturing of corrugating equipment and tooling; non-metal gaskets for automotive, telecommunications, appliances, swimming pools, medical, marine, electrical conduit and fittings, robotics cable protection systems, mass transit, and custom use, namely, for manufacturing of corrugating equipment and tooling; non-metal couplings for use with sewer systems | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | Plastic tubes and pipes systems, namely, non-metal gutter pipes, non-metal sewer pipes, non-metal water pipes, non-metal rigid pipes, infiltration tubes, namely, non-metal filtering tubes used to prevent storm water runoff pollutants from entering sewer systems, dehydration devices, namely, plastic water conduits for roofs and balconies, storm water management devices, namely, non-metal catchment basins and non-metal detention basins in the nature of cisterns, non-metal storm water dry wells and structural parts and fittings therefor for drainage sewers, flushing sewers and collecting sewers for dehydration, inspection manhole, all of the aforesaid for sewer systems; non-metal manhole cover consisting of concrete; concrete drainage structures, namely, trench drains; non-metallic construction materials, namely, drain bases and grates; rings for adjusting the height of manhole covers or sewer drains to correspond with the height of surrounding roads, consisting of concrete for sewer systems | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 14, 2017 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 14, 2017 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 4, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 1, 2013 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 12, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 28, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 28, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 12, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 22, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 5, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 5, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 11, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 12, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |