USPTO serial 79047200
SINDRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3554358Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 30, 2008
- Examiner
- COLEMAN, CIMMERIAN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with SINDRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mainak H. Mehta
Mainak H. Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves and Savitch, LLP525 B St, Suite 2200San Diego, CA 92101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electromechanical and/or hydraulic printing and embossing machines; machines for Nano Imprint Litography (NIL), Electron Beam Recorder (EBR) based lithography and printing plates; semiconductor manufacturing machines; semiconductor wafer processing machines and equipment; electronic integrated circuits manufacturing machines; machines for manufacturing recorded optical storage discs and/or recorded magnetic data carriers, storage discs and electronic memories; machines for manufacturing flat panel display screens, liquid crystal display screens and light emitting diode display screens; all intended for research and/or industrial purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | [ Scanning Electron Microscopes (SEM); ] computer programs for control of Nano Imprint Lithography (NIL) and Electron Beam Recorder (EBR) machines and tools | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2020 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 21, 2020 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 20, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 1, 2020 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 1, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2019 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 28, 2019 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2019 | 15AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2019 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2019 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Jun 27, 2019 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2019 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2019 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| Jun 18, 2019 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 16, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 16, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 24, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 2, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |