USPTO serial 79047269
DARLING SPUDS POTATO CHIPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3505597Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 23, 2008
- Examiner
- FLOWERS, JAY K
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with DARLING SPUDS POTATO CHIPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A. Plumley
David A. Plumley LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE LLPP.O. BOX 29001Glendale, CA 91209-9001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Potato crisps, mixed vegetable crisps [, sweet potato crisps, parsnip crisps, beetroot crisps ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Salty Dog Brands Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Salty Dog Brands Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Salty Dog Brands Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named DARLING SPUDS POTATO CHIPS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2019 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 24, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 23, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 10, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 10, 2014 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2014 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 5, 2014 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 8, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 18, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 30, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 30, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 30, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 28, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |