Drawing for BURGUNDY HILLS

USPTO serial 79047293

BURGUNDY HILLS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3540520Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 2, 2008
Examiner
SAPPENFIELD, ANN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BURGUNDY HILLS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Lebow

JURISPATENT - CABINET GUIU MARK LEBOW, ESQ. // YOUNG & THOMPSON209 MADISON STREETSUITE 500ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Controlled origin label wine from exactly the Burgundy region, including aligoté, aligoté primeur, Bourgogne Blanc, Chitry, Côte Chalonnaise, Côte Saint Jacques, Côtes d'Auxerre, Côtes du Couchois, Coutanges-la-Vineuse, Epineuil, Hautes Côtes de Beaune, Hautes Côtes de Nuits, la Chapelle Notre Dame, Le Chapitre, Montrecul, Bourgogne Ordinaire or Grand Ordinaire, Passe-tout-grains, Bourgogne primeur blanc, Bourgogne rosé or clairet, Bourgogne rosé or clairet, Chitry, Bourgogne rosé or clairet, Côte Chalonnaise, Bourgogne rosé ou clairet, Côte Saint Jacques, Bourgogne rosé or clairet, Côtes d'Auxerre, Bourgogne rosé or clairet, Coulanges-la-vineuse, Bourgogne rosé or clairet, Epineuil, Bourgogne rosé or clairet, Hautes Côtes de Beaune, Bourgogne rosé or clairet, Hautes Côtes de Nuits, Bourgogne rosé or clairet, La Chapelle Notre Dame, Bourgogne rosé or clairet, Le Chapitre, Bourgogne rosé or clairet, Montre-cul, Bourgogne Tonnerre, Bourgogne Vézelay, Crémant de Bourgogne and the wines used for its production; Eaux de vie from exactly the Burgundy region, namely, Marc de Bourgogne Eau-de-vie and Vin de Bourgogne Eau-de-vieSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 18, 2009DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 20, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 20, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 2, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 2, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 16, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 27, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 8, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 4, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 18, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 18, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 18, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 18, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 8, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 22, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 22, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 21, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 20, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 31, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 31, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance