Drawing for TMAX PROWAVE

USPTO serial 79047312

TMAX PROWAVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COLEMAN, CIMMERIAN
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TMAX PROWAVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer programs for use in the development and design of websites; computer software for use in the development and design of websites; computer programs for use as user interface platforms; graphical user interface softwareSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 6, 2018UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jun 2, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 1, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 6, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 5, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 7, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 6, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 12, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 28, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 28, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 6, 2009PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jan 12, 2009PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Dec 29, 2008APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Dec 15, 2008PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 19, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 14, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 23, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 22, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 22, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 21, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 2, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 31, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance