Drawing for CONTISEAL

USPTO serial 79047315

CONTISEAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3547077Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 16, 2008
Examiner
RIRIE, VERNA BETH
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with CONTISEAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John W. McGlynn

John W. McGlynn RatnerPrestia2200 Renaissance BoulevardSuite 350King of Prussia, PA 19406

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Vehicle tires; inner tubes for tires, solid rubber tires, tread for the retreading of tires, casings for pneumatic tiresACTIVE—
017[ Natural rubber, gutta-percha, rubber, semi-processed plastics; sealing, packing and insulation material; hoses not of metal, non-metal weather draught excluder strips for tires, rubber material for recapping tires, tire sealing materials of latex ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 22, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2024ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 5, 2018NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Nov 5, 2018C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 30, 2018ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 23, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 18, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 26, 2015INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 26, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Aug 5, 2015INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 5, 2014NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 201471.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Dec 5, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 19, 2014ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 27, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 1, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 1, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 16, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 16, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 30, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 10, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 27, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 27, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 18, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 31, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 31, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 31, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 21, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 21, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 29, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 11, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 11, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 9, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 8, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 2, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 31, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance