Drawing for Serial No. 79047457

USPTO serial 79047457

Serial No. 79047457

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3602668Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 7, 2009
Examiner
RITTNER, HANNO I
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79047457?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark I. Peroff

MARK I. PEROFF HISCOCK & BARCLAY, LLPSEVEN TIMES SQNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Perfumes, toilet waters, eau-de-Cologne, deodorants for personal use; essential oils for personal use; oils for cosmetic purposes, namely, cosmetic oils; cleansing milks; soaps; cosmetic creams and lotions for face and body care; cosmetic suntan lotions; cosmetic preparations for slimming purposes; cosmetics; make-up preparations specifically mascara; foundation, blush, make-up powders; cosmetic pencils; cosmetics for highlighting; lipsticks; nail varnish; shaving soaps; shaving gels; shaving foams; after-shave lotions; moisturizing after-shave creams; bubble baths, bath and shower gels; hair lotions; shampoosSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 25, 2018UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Apr 27, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 27, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 21, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 14, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 14, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jul 13, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 13, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 31, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 18, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 23, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 7, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 7, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 20, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 31, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 15, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 11, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 11, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 10, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 19, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 19, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 19, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 18, 2008PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2008APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Oct 29, 2008PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 27, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 15, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 30, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 30, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 30, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 29, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 16, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 4, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 3, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance