Drawing for X-ELLENT

USPTO serial 79047470

X-ELLENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHARMA, NAPOLEON
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with X-ELLENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Industrial chemicals, complex mixtures made up of a variety of ingredients (scented substances), for use in their natural state for perfuming various finished products (alcohol-based luxury perfumery, cosmetics, detergent soaps, household products) namely industrial chemicalsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
003Soaps, perfumes, toilet water, eau-de-Cologne, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions, dentifricesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 1, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 20, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 28, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 28, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 4, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 4, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 28, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 28, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 14, 2008NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 24, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 24, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 22, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 21, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 4, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 3, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance