Drawing for SOFTWARE1ONE THE SOFTWARE LICENSING EXPERTS

USPTO serial 79047554

SOFTWARE1ONE THE SOFTWARE LICENSING EXPERTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3661006Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 28, 2009
Examiner
MORENO, PAUL A
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with SOFTWARE1ONE THE SOFTWARE LICENSING EXPERTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Craig A. Fieschko

Craig A. Fieschko DeWitt LLP2 E. Mifflin St., 6th FloorMadison, WI 53703-2865UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND SOFTWARE FOR USE IN DATA-BASE MANAGEMENT IN THE FIELD OF SECURITY AND LICENSINGACTIVE
035PROFESSIONAL BUSINESS CONSULTING, MANAGEMENT OF COMPUTERIZED FILES, BUSINESS ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANCYACTIVE
038PROVISION OF ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKACTIVE
042COMPUTER CONSULTANCY IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER SECURITY; [ COMPUTER SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN; ] COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, HELP DESK SERVICES; MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; INSTALLATION OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; UPDATING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS [ ; MAINTAINING AND CREATING OF WEBSITES FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, OPTIMIZING AND ANALYZING OF WEBSITES OF OTHERS ]ACTIVE
045CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF MAINTAINING THE SECURITY AND INTEGRITY OF DATABASES, MONITORING OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS FOR SECURITY PURPOSESACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 1, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Aug 6, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 17, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 6, 2020INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jan 11, 2020XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Jan 11, 2020XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Dec 23, 2019INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Apr 23, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Apr 23, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Apr 5, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jul 28, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Feb 22, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 30, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
May 4, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Aug 19, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Aug 19, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Aug 19, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jul 20, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Apr 14, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 4, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Nov 4, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Oct 28, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 28, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 19, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 4, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jun 4, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 12, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 22, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 8, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 7, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 11, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Mar 11, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 5, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 15, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 15, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 11, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 20, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 19, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 6, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 6, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 5, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 1, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 8, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 7, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Feb 7, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Feb 7, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Feb 6, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 4, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Jan 3, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance