Drawing for LUIGI BRUNO

USPTO serial 79047578

LUIGI BRUNO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LUIGI BRUNO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Leather and imitation leather, and goods made of these materials and not included in other classes; animal skins and hides; trunks and suitcases; umbrellas, parasols and walking sticks; whips, harness and saddlerySECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
024Textiles and textile goods, not included in other classes; blankets and tableclothsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
025Clothing, footwear, headgearSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 23, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 22, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 1, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 20, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 20, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 4, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 4, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 20, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 20, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 28, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 11, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 11, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 11, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 10, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 4, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 3, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance