Drawing for COINLIGHT-OSTAR

USPTO serial 79047581

COINLIGHT-OSTAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3537323Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 25, 2008
Examiner
STRUCK, ROBERT J
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COINLIGHT-OSTAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Milton M. Oliver

Milton M. Oliver WARE FRESSOLA VDS and ADOLPHSON755 Main St., Bldg. Five;PO BOX 224; BRADFORD GREENMONROE, CT 06468-0224

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Solid-state light sources with optics, in the nature of light emitting diodes; light emitting diodes, including organic light emitting diodes, light emitting diode modules, namely, modules with lamp functions, comprised of light-emitting diodes, for signaling and for displays, including organic displaysSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
011Apparatus for lighting, namely, electric lamps and luminaires, and structural parts of the aforesaid goodsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 23, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 23, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 31, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 22, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 22, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Feb 26, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 26, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Aug 5, 2014CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jul 31, 2014CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 21, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 29, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 7, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 15, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 23, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 17, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 26, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 25, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 17, 2008ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Sep 3, 2008CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Aug 26, 2008APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jul 7, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 14, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 1, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 1, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 30, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 14, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 14, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 14, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 31, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 6, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 5, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 5, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 29, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 19, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 19, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 22, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 22, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 19, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 18, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 4, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 3, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance