Drawing for BIOLOX OPTION

USPTO serial 79047598

BIOLOX OPTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMPSON, HEATHER
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIOLOX OPTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Implants (from artificial materials) for osteosynthesis, ortheses, endoprostheses and organ substitutions, anchors for endoprostheses, and bone spacers, surgical and medical devices and instrumentsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 14, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 23, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 7, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 12, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 11, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 20, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 23, 2009ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 28, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 24, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 22, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 26, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 4, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 4, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 22, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 22, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 22, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 15, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 23, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 23, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 23, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 22, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 4, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 3, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance