USPTO serial 79047713
OROCYAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3728470Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 22, 2009
- Examiner
- BROWNE, DAYNA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OROCYAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Food supplements; ingredients used in the composition of dietetic food supplements, namely, fruit extracts as an additive for food supplements; and dietetic substances for medical use, namely, fruit extracts for medical use | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 029 | Food supplements, dietetic substances and ingredients used in the composition of food supplements and dietetic substances for non-medical use made with meat, fish, poultry and game, namely, protein for use as a food additive; meat extracts, preserved, dried and cooked fruit and vegetables; jellies, jams, compotes; eggs; milk; dairy products, namely, dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; and edible oils and fats | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Food supplements, dietetic substances and ingredients used in the composition of food supplements and dietetic substances for non-medical use made with coffee, namely, coffee extracts and coffee-based beverages; tea; cocoa; sugar; rice; tapioca; sago; artificial coffee; flours; preparations made from cereals, namely, processed cereal-based food to be used as a breakfast food, snack food or ingredient for making other foods; bread; pastry; confectionery, namely, candy; edible ices; honey; treacle syrup; yeast; baking powder; salt; mustard; vinegar, condiments, namely, sauces; spices; ice for refreshment | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FERLUX
- Other trademarks owned by FERLUX
- Other trademarks owned by FERLUX
- Other trademarks owned by FERLUX
- Other trademarks owned by MEDIOLANUM FARMACEUTICI S.P.A.
- Other trademarks owned by MEDIOLANUM PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named OROCYAN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 10, 2017 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 19, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 29, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 6, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 16, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 3, 2008 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |