USPTO serial 79047800
GOB1
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GOB1?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 023 | Yarns and threads for textile use, elastic thread and yarn for textile use, rubber thread for textile use, fibreglass thread for textile use | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shirts; footwear; headgear, namely, hats and caps; shirts; leather and imitation leather clothing, namely, pants; belts; fur coats; gloves; scarves; ties; hosiery; socks; slippers; beach, ski and sports footwear; cloth baby bibs; underwear | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 3, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 8, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 7, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 11, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |