Drawing for EASYKART

USPTO serial 79047821

EASYKART

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MACFARLANE, JAMES W
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EASYKART?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John P. Murtaugh

John P. Murtaugh Pearne & Gordon LLP1801 East 9th Street, Suite 1200Cleveland, OH 44114-3108UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Motor vehicles operated by electric or internal combustion motors and engines, namely, go-karts; vehicle chassis, vehicle bodies, steering wheels, seats, braking systems; electric and internal combustion motors and engines, suspension systems; wheels and tires for motor vehicles, namely, wheels and tires for go-karts used in relaxation, sport and competitionsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 16, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 20, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 26, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 25, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 26, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 11, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 11, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 27, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 25, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 19, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 21, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 21, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 21, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 20, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 11, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 11, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 10, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance