USPTO serial 79047850
PLUG T
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3647658Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 30, 2009
- Examiner
- SHARMA, NAPOLEON
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PLUG T?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | SURGICAL, MEDICAL, DENTAL AND VETERINARY APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, SURGICAL MESHES MADE OF MONOFILAMENT POLYPROPYLENE USED IN THE REPAIR OF HERNIAS AND IN THE TREATMENT OF THE PELVIC FLOOR REPAIR; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS, EYES AND TEETH; ORTHOPAEDIC ARTICLES, NAMELY, RIGID MESH FOR USE IN THE HERNIA REPAIR | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2017 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 5, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 1, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 18, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 25, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 3, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 8, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |