Drawing for REDFUSION

USPTO serial 79047871

REDFUSION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MIDDLETON, BERNICE L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REDFUSION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Fixed digital multi point speed traffic enforcement camera to include average speed measurement, zonal enforcement and road user chargingSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 17, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 16, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 7, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 9, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 9, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 13, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 18, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 18, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 9, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 9, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 8, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 30, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 30, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 30, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 29, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 18, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance