Drawing for BIRCHER

USPTO serial 79047924

BIRCHER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3639644Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 16, 2009
Examiner
MIDDLETON, BERNICE L
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIRCHER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carole R. Klien

Carole R. Klien Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NWWashington, DC 20004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic and pneumatic sensors for doors, namely, motion and presence sensors for automatic pedestrian and industrial doors; electronic and pneumatic sensors for gates, namely, motion and presence sensors for automatic gates; electronic and pneumatic sensors for machines and robots, namely, presence sensors for machines and robots; electronic and pneumatic sensors and switches for mass transit and public transport equipment, namely, presence sensors for doors used in mass transit and public transportation equipment; computer hardware for control of electronic motion and presence sensorsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 6, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 6, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 5, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Oct 20, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Oct 20, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Sep 22, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 22, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 14, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 22, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 22, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 16, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 25, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 16, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 31, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 11, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 26, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 25, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 19, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 13, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 22, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 22, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 22, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 10, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 10, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 7, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 7, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 7, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 7, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 9, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 30, 2008DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Apr 3, 2008UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 3, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 31, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2008NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 29, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 31, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 31, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 31, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 30, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 18, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance