USPTO serial 79047951
WILLOW & FINN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3696029Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 13, 2009
- Examiner
- RIRIE, VERNA BETH
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WILLOW & FINN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SPRINGVALE VIC 3171, AU
SPRINGVALE VIC 3171, AU
SPRINGVALE VIC 3171, AU
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely, arm warmers; articles of clothing made from wool, namely, shirts and jackets; articles of clothing made of fur, namely, coats and jackets; articles of clothing made of hides, namely, coats and jackets; articles of clothing made of imitation leather, namely, coats and jackets; articles of clothing made of leather, namely, coats and jackets; articles of clothing made of plush imitation fur, namely, coats and jackets; articles of water-resistant clothing, namely, jackets; articles of weatherproof clothing, namely, jackets; articles of windproof clothing, namely, wind resistant jackets; athletic clothing, namely, shorts and t-shirts; beach clothing, namely, swimsuits and coverups; belts; boys' clothing, namely, shirts and pants; clothing suspenders; cashmere clothing, namely, sweaters and tops; casual clothing, namely, pants and shirts; children's clothing, namely, pants, shirts and dresses; clothing, namely, t-shirts and shorts; clothing for babies, namely, baby bodysuits and one-piece play suits; clothing for sports, namely, sports bras and sports jerseys; clothing for surfing, namely, board shorts; clothing for swimming, namely, swimsuits; clothing of fur, namely, hats and stoles; clothing of imitations of leather and leather, namely, pants; clothing, not being protective clothing, treated with fire and heat retardants, namely, pajamas; combinations; cowl-neck sweaters; denims; drawers; ear muffs; fur cloaks; gabardine dresses; girl's clothing, namely, dresses and tops; gloves; halter tops; headbands; hoods; infants' clothing, namely, pajamas; jackets; jerseys; jumpsuits; kerchiefs; knitted clothing, namely, sweaters and scarves; knitwear, namely, dresses and tops; ladies clothing, namely, dresses, tops and pants; layettes; leather belts; linen articles of clothing, namely, shirts and skirts; mantles; maternity clothing, namely, tops, pants and dresses; men's clothing, namely, shirts, pants and jackets; money belts; muffs; plush imitation fur clothing, namely, children's jackets; rainproof clothing, namely, hats and shirts; ready-made clothing, namely, underwear and socks; ready-to-wear clothing, namely, shirts; silk clothing, namely, blouses; ski clothing, namely, ski bibs; slips; sports clothing, namely, jogging suits; stockings; stuff jackets; tennis clothing, namely, skirts and shorts; thermal clothing, namely, underwear; thermally insulated clothing, namely, pants; thongs; three piece suits; veils; waterproof, water-resistant, weather resistant and weatherproof outer clothing, namely, coats, jackets and boots; wind-resistant jackets for women; woolen clothing, namely, coats; woven articles of clothing, namely, dresses and shirts; wraps; wristbands | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 19, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 20, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 20, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 27, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 28, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 10, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 14, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 14, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 4, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 18, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 29, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 10, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 9, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |