Drawing for SOLARCAP

USPTO serial 79047959

SOLARCAP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3623098Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 19, 2009
Examiner
EINSTEIN, MATTHEW T
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOLARCAP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher K. Larus

Christopher K. Larus Robins Kaplan LLP800 LaSalle Avenue2800 LaSalle PlazaMinneapolis, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Development and technological research in the field of solar powerSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jun 8, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 28, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 25, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 25, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Aug 25, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 25, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 31, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 30, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 25, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 15, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 15, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 28, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 19, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 19, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 3, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 11, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 25, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 25, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 12, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 6, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 7, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 7, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 16, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 16, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 16, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 16, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 16, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 16, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 21, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 28, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 28, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 28, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 27, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 28, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 25, 2008LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance