USPTO serial 79047967
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat, fish, poultry and game; meat extracts; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, fruit sauces; eggs, milk and milk products; edible oils and fats | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Bar and restaurant franchising services (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13.2.b) of the Common Regulations) | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 043 | Catering (providing food and drink); bar, cafeteria, pub and restaurant services | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 11, 2017 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Dec 1, 2016 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 24, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 8, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 8, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |