Drawing for BAIO

USPTO serial 79048012

BAIO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODSAID, IRA
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BAIO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John W. McGlynn

John W. McGlynn RatnerPrestiaP.O. Box 15961007 Orange Street, Suite 1100Wilmington, DE 19899

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal parts, metal seals for fittings for gas and liquids; metal parts for fittings for gas and liquids, sleeves, sleeve shutters (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - Rule 13(2)(b) of the Common Regulations under the Madrid Agreement and Protocol), straps, caps, flanges, safety devices against traction and rotation (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - Rule 13(2)(b) of the Common Regulations under the Madrid Agreement and Protocol); couplings; coupling parts for pipe installations; fittings, fittings metal devices as hand wheels, passable covers, passable covers for drain pipes, telescopic covers, fixed and telescopic handling packings, positioning indicators, as well as height-adjustable and/or levellable shaftcovers and their base components and frames (made of metal) (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - Rule 13(2)(b) of the Common Regulations under the Madrid Agreement and Protocol); pipe fittings (made of metal) for gas and other non-aggressive fluids; metal packings for valves, for valve plugs prolongings (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - Rule 13(2)(b) of the Common Regulations under the Madrid Agreement and Protocol); metallic valves (other than parts of machines)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
008Hand-operated tools for assembling and disassembling fittings, and for their maintenance; repairing tools, namely cutting, beveling and drifting pipes (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - Rule 13(2)(b) of the Common Regulations under the Madrid Agreement and Protocol); solid wrenches; tools for curving and drawing pipes (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - Rule 13(2)(b) of the Common Regulations under the Madrid Agreement and Protocol)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
011Hydrants (water holes); oven fittings; seals for exhaust hoods; valves (parts of machines) for regulations, namely valves for pressure reduction, debit regulation or level regulation (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - Rule 13(2)(b) of the Common Regulations under the Madrid Agreement and Protocol)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
017Rubber seals for fittings for gas and other fluids; pipe fittings (non-metallic) for gas and non-aggressive fluids; non-metallic packing valves, for valve plugs prolongings (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - Rule 13(2)(b) of the Common Regulations under the Madrid Agreement and Protocol)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
037Services for assembling and disassembling fittings, in particular for gas, water installations and for other pressure installation systemsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Technical and project planning services for fittings, in particular for gas and water fittings and other installation systemsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 4, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Nov 3, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 14, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2011OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 26, 2011GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 9, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 11, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 11, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 11, 2010PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jan 11, 2010APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Dec 9, 2009PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2009FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 30, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 28, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 25, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 25, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 10, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 25, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 25, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 28, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 25, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 25, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 15, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 28, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 28, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 28, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 27, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 25, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance