USPTO serial 79048012
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John W. McGlynn
John W. McGlynn RatnerPrestiaP.O. Box 15961007 Orange Street, Suite 1100Wilmington, DE 19899| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal parts, metal seals for fittings for gas and liquids; metal parts for fittings for gas and liquids, sleeves, sleeve shutters (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - Rule 13(2)(b) of the Common Regulations under the Madrid Agreement and Protocol), straps, caps, flanges, safety devices against traction and rotation (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - Rule 13(2)(b) of the Common Regulations under the Madrid Agreement and Protocol); couplings; coupling parts for pipe installations; fittings, fittings metal devices as hand wheels, passable covers, passable covers for drain pipes, telescopic covers, fixed and telescopic handling packings, positioning indicators, as well as height-adjustable and/or levellable shaftcovers and their base components and frames (made of metal) (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - Rule 13(2)(b) of the Common Regulations under the Madrid Agreement and Protocol); pipe fittings (made of metal) for gas and other non-aggressive fluids; metal packings for valves, for valve plugs prolongings (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - Rule 13(2)(b) of the Common Regulations under the Madrid Agreement and Protocol); metallic valves (other than parts of machines) | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 008 | Hand-operated tools for assembling and disassembling fittings, and for their maintenance; repairing tools, namely cutting, beveling and drifting pipes (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - Rule 13(2)(b) of the Common Regulations under the Madrid Agreement and Protocol); solid wrenches; tools for curving and drawing pipes (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - Rule 13(2)(b) of the Common Regulations under the Madrid Agreement and Protocol) | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | Hydrants (water holes); oven fittings; seals for exhaust hoods; valves (parts of machines) for regulations, namely valves for pressure reduction, debit regulation or level regulation (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - Rule 13(2)(b) of the Common Regulations under the Madrid Agreement and Protocol) | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | Rubber seals for fittings for gas and other fluids; pipe fittings (non-metallic) for gas and non-aggressive fluids; non-metallic packing valves, for valve plugs prolongings (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - Rule 13(2)(b) of the Common Regulations under the Madrid Agreement and Protocol) | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Services for assembling and disassembling fittings, in particular for gas, water installations and for other pressure installation systems | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Technical and project planning services for fittings, in particular for gas and water fittings and other installation systems | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2011 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 28, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 25, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 15, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 27, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |