USPTO serial 79048022
KOTT-GLIDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3771606Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 6, 2010
- Examiner
- BROWN, TINA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KOTT-GLIDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Hoses of metal for plumbing use and swimming pools; tubes of metal | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | Devices for water pipes and sanitary installations, namely, filtering units for water filtering, electrical water heaters, hot water tanks, gas water heaters, water distilling units, faucets, showers, electrical furnace and electrical boilers; bath fittings, namely, drains, couplers, valves, spouts, traps, bibbs and plumbing pipe nipples; showers and shower cubicles, namely, shower enclosures; pipes being parts of sanitary installations, in particular, hoses for sprinklers and showers included in this class; taps; mixer taps for water pipes; anti-splash tap nozzles; sanitary apparatus and installations, in particular, nozzle heads in the nature of shower heads and shower head sprayers, hand showers, overhead showers, mountings for hand showers; portable Turkish bath cabinets in the nature of portable saunas; water bearing fittings and valves, in particular, fittings and valves for showers, namely, shower control valves; washstands | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | Waterproof packings for preventing plumbing leaks; canvas hose pipes for use in plumbing; joint packing for pipes; hoses of textile material, in particular, sprinkler and shower hoses; hoses, not of metal, in particular, sprinkler and shower hoses; valves of India-rubber or vulcanized fiber | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kottmann GOSLA GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Kottmann GOSLA GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Kottmann GOSLA GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Kottmann Technology GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named KOTT-GLIDE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 11, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 3, 2015 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 19, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 16, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 23, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 11, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |