USPTO serial 79048038
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy J. Kelly
Timothy J. Kelly T.J. KELLY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW, PCPO Box 128Bay Head, NJ 08742UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Parts of bearings, namely, metal rollers, steel balls and needles; metal curved rollers and support rollers for use in machines and engines; metal split rings | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Bearings, namely, ball bearings, needle bearings and roller bearings for use in machines and engines; parts of bearings, namely, ball rings and ball cages; machine parts, namely, plain bearings, ball joints, joint heads with bars and their component parts; cardan joints and their component parts being parts of carding machines; spare parts for automobiles, namely, connecting rods; valve tappets being parts of machines; clutches for machines and their component parts; textile scotching, tentering and washing machines, namely, top rollers for drawing frames and their loading arms, bearings for bottom rollers, spinning spindles and tension rollers; tools, namely, metalworking machine tools all specially designed for the installation and maintenance of machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | [ Measuring apparatus and instruments, namely, electric displays and control units for machineries, namely, electric luminescent display panels and electronic apparatus, namely, plasma display panels ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | [ Universal joints for land vehicles, namely, ball joints, joint heads with bars and their component parts, cardan joints and their component parts; spare parts for automobiles, namely, cardan shafts and steering knuckles; clutches for land vehicles and their component parts ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | [ Water-tight rings for plumbing pipes ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2026 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 17, 2026 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 17, 2026 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 17, 2026 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 17, 2026 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 26, 2026 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Dec 18, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 4, 2020 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2020 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 29, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2017 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | RHRD | RESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 1, 2016 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2016 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 24, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2015 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 24, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 4, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 11, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 11, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 19, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 11, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 24, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 2, 2009 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 6, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 22, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 21, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |