Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 79048060?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/79048060. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns BLEU D'AZUR?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 79048060, the listed owner(s) include: Patrick RENE.

What is USPTO serial number 79048060?

Serial number 79048060 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark BLEU D'AZUR. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover BLEU D'AZUR?

The public record lists International Classes: 025. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 79048060

BLEU D'AZUR

Q: What is the current status of BLEU D'AZUR?

BLEU D'AZUR (79048060) currently shows USPTO status code 402 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402

Filing date: Jul 27, 2007
Status date: Feb 11, 2013
Registration date: —
Examiner: YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
Law office: TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLEU D'AZUR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Patrick RENE
FR
Other trademarks owned by Patrick RENE

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christina Loza

Christina Loza Loza & Loza, LLP305 North Second Avenue#127Upland, CA 91786

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
025	Clothing, namely, t-shirts, tunics, tops, dresses, jackets, capris, trousers, skirts, shirts, shorts and tank tops	SECTION 70 - CANCELLED	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Sep 6, 2013	DETH	DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION	—
Jul 23, 2010	FINT	FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB	—
Jun 21, 2010	FICS	FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB	—
Jun 19, 2010	FICR	FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB	—
Jul 10, 2009	OPNX	NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB	—
Jun 25, 2009	OPNS	NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB	—
Jun 25, 2009	OPNR	NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB	—
Jun 19, 2009	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 19, 2009	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 21, 2008	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2008	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2008	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2008	XAEC	EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED	—
Nov 21, 2008	GNEN	NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED	—
Nov 21, 2008	GNEA	EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED	—
Nov 21, 2008	CNEA	EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN	—
Oct 17, 2008	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Oct 17, 2008	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Oct 17, 2008	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Oct 1, 2008	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 1, 2008	PETG	PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED	—
Oct 1, 2008	PROA	TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED	—
Sep 20, 2008	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 20, 2008	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
Aug 28, 2008	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 28, 2008	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 11, 2008	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Feb 15, 2008	RFNT	REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB	—
Jan 31, 2008	RFCS	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB	—
Jan 31, 2008	RFRR	REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU	—
Jan 31, 2008	RFCR	NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW	—
Jan 30, 2008	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2008	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Jan 25, 2008	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—
Jan 24, 2008	SDRC	SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB	—