USPTO serial 79048104
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
69190 Walldorf, DE
69190 Walldorf, DE
Walldorf, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Victoria Friedman
Victoria Friedman Dennemeyer & Associates, LLC2 North Riverside Plaza, Suite 1500Chicago, IL 60606UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Compilation and systematization of data and information in computer data bases accessible on the internet, including data and information relating to the development, creation, programming, production, performance, distribution, application, use, mode of operation, handling, modification, maintenance, rental, updating, design and outsourcing of computer programs and software | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2023 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2023 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 20, 2023 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2021 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2019 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2019 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 26, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 19, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2019 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 3, 2015 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 13, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 12, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2013 | FISN | FINAL DECISION PROCESSED AND SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 1, 2013 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 17, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 24, 2012 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 2, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 29, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 11, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 10, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 15, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 18, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 15, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 29, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |