Drawing for BYDESIGN

USPTO serial 79048104

BYDESIGN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4287163Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 12, 2013
Examiner
STRUCK, ROBERT J
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with BYDESIGN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Victoria Friedman

Victoria Friedman Dennemeyer & Associates, LLC2 North Riverside Plaza, Suite 1500Chicago, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Compilation and systematization of data and information in computer data bases accessible on the internet, including data and information relating to the development, creation, programming, production, performance, distribution, application, use, mode of operation, handling, modification, maintenance, rental, updating, design and outsourcing of computer programs and softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 30, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2023NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 202371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Aug 9, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 20, 2023ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2021INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 26, 2019NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
Jun 26, 2019C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 26, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 19, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2019ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 3, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 29, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 29, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 13, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 13, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 12, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 29, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 15, 2013FISNFINAL DECISION PROCESSED AND SENT TO IB—
Feb 12, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 1, 2013GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 27, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 17, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 7, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 7, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 24, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 24, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 27, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 14, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 24, 2012RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Apr 9, 2012DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 4, 2012DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 14, 2012CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Mar 14, 2012CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jan 17, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 2, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 2, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 2, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 29, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 11, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 10, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 10, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 16, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 15, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 18, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 2, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 2, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 15, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 15, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 15, 2008CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 14, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 8, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 7, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 29, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 7, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 7, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 7, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 6, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 1, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance