Drawing for LINEMICRO

USPTO serial 79048110

LINEMICRO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3524435Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 28, 2008
Examiner
TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LINEMICRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John P. Sullivan

John P. Sullivan Volpe & Koenig, P.C.18th Floor30 South 17th StreetPhiladelphia, PA 19103-4009

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Professional cooking ovens; convection gas ovens for restaurants, convection electric ovens for restaurants, mixed convection-steam electric ovens for restaurants, mixed convection-steam gas ovens for restaurants, static electric ovens for pizzas, static gas ovens for pizzas, convection electric ovens for pizzas, convection gas ovens for pizzas, electric grills, electric cooking hobs in ceramic glass, electric toasters, heated showcases for food; apparatus for cooking, namely, cooktopsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 18, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 7, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 7, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 7, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 28, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 31, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Oct 31, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 31, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 23, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 7, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 10, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 10, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 28, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 28, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 12, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 23, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 10, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 10, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 10, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 9, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 9, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 9, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 9, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 9, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 29, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 7, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 7, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 7, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 6, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 1, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance