Drawing for DR VRANJES FIRENZE

USPTO serial 79048117

DR VRANJES FIRENZE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STEIN, JAMES W
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DR VRANJES FIRENZE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use; cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations; soaps; perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions; dentifricesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 16, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 15, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 30, 2017LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Dec 22, 2017RHRDRESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 23, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2015CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 6, 2015CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 15, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 18, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 12, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 12, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 13, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 12, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 18, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 2, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 2, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 14, 2009CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jan 14, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 13, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 12, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 2, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 22, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 14, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 13, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 13, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 13, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 24, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 3, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 3, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 2, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 1, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 1, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance