Drawing for FURY

USPTO serial 79048167

FURY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MIDDLETON, BERNICE L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FURY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer and games software; computer hardware; interactive entertainment products; computer games; electronic games played on the Internet and computers; software for electronic games and amusement products and machines; multimedia products and software; video and audio products; CD-ROM products for entertainmentSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 23, 2018UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Feb 10, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 9, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 20, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 9, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 9, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 18, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 2, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 2, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 9, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 9, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 29, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 11, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 11, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 9, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 8, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 1, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance