Drawing for MLEKIMEX ELENA

USPTO serial 79048212

MLEKIMEX ELENA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MIDDLETON, BERNICE L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MLEKIMEX ELENA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Milk and milk products; yoghurt, cheese; yellow cheese; pasteurized milk; edible oils and fats; milk beverages with milk predominating; rennet; wheySECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
030Flours and cereal preparations, bread; confectionery products, edible ices; honey, treacle syrup; yeast, baking-powder; salt, mustard; vinegar, sauces (condiments); spices; coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, artificial coffeeSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 24, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 23, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 30, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 28, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 27, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 18, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 2, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 2, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 29, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 27, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 14, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 20, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 20, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 20, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 19, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 1, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance