USPTO serial 79048240
KUM BEAUTY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3606182Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 14, 2009
- Examiner
- GRIFFIN, JAMES
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KUM BEAUTY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marcia A. Auberger
Marcia A. Auberger Venable LLPP.O. Box 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Bleaching preparations for laundry use; cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations; soaps; perfumery; cosmetics; cosmetic pencils; cosmetic skin care preparations; lipsticks; essential oils; hair lotions; shampoos; dentifrices; make-up bags sold filled with cosmetics | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 12, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 27, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 7, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 21, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 1, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |