USPTO serial 79048294
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leo M. Loughlin
Leo M. Loughlin Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, pc607 14th Street NWSuite 800Washington, DC 20005| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | BLEACHING PREPARATIONS AND OTHER SUBSTANCES FOR LAUNDRY USE, NAMELY, BLEACHING PREPARATIONS FOR HOUSEHOLD USE, LAUNDRY BLEACH, LAUNDRY DETERGENT; GENERAL PURPOSE CLEANING, POLISHING, SCOURING AND ABRASIVE LIQUIDS AND POWDERS; SOAPS; PERFUMERY; ESSENTIAL OILS; COSMETICS; HAIR LOTIONS; AND DENTIFRICES | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | SCIENTIFIC, NAUTICAL, SURVEYING, PHOTOGRAPHIC, CINEMATOGRAPHIC, OPTICAL, WEIGHING, MEASURING, SIGNALING, CHECKING, SUPERVISION, LIFE-SAVING AND TEACHING APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, SENSING AND SIGNALING DEVICES FOR MEASUREMENT AND QUALITY CONTROL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING BY LASER, RECEIVERS FOR SATELLITES, SATELLITE AERIALS, SATELLITE DISHES, SATELLITE PROCESSORS, SATELLITES; APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR CONDUCTING, SWITCHING, TRANSFORMING, ACCUMULATING, REGULATING OR CONTROLLING ELECTRICITY, NAMELY, ELECTRIC RESISTERS, ELECTRICITY CONDUITS, ADAPTERS; APPARATUS FOR RECORDING, TRANSMISSION OR REPRODUCTION OF SOUND OR IMAGES; BLANK MAGNETIC DATA CARRIERS; BLANK RECORD DISCS; AUTOMATIC VENDING MACHINES AND MECHANISMS FOR COIN-OPERATED APPARATUS; CASH REGISTERS; CALCULATING MACHINES; DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, DATA PROCESSORS, CENTRAL PROCESSING UNITS FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION, DATA, SOUND OR IMAGES; COMPUTERS; FIRE-EXTINGUISHING APPARATUS; COMPUTER OPERATING PROGRAMS, RECORDED | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 014 | PRECIOUS METALS AND THEIR ALLOYS; GOODS IN PRECIOUS METALS OR COATED THEREWITH AS JEWELRY, NAMELY, EARRINGS, BRACELETS, NECKLACES, RINGS, BROOCHES, CHAINS, KEY RINGS OF PRECIOUS METALS; JEWELRY AND PRECIOUS STONES; HOROLOGICAL AND CHRONOMETRIC INSTRUMENTS | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 018 | LEATHER AND IMITATIONS OF LEATHER; GOODS MADE OF LEATHER AND IMITATION LEATHER, NAMELY, BRIEFCASES, LEATHER AND IMITATION LEATHER BAGS, LEATHER FOR FURNITURE, LEATHER FOR SHOES, LEATHER HANDBAGS, LEATHER KEY CHAINS, LEATHER PURSES, LEATHER STRAPS, TRAVELING CASES OF LEATHER; ANIMAL SKINS AND HIDES; TRUNKS; TRAVELING BAGS; UMBRELLAS; PARASOLS; WALKING STICKS; WHIPS; HARNESSES AND SADDLERY | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | FURNITURE, MIRRORS, PICTURE FRAMES; GOODS OF WOOD, CORK, REED, CANE, WICKER, HORN, BONE, IVORY, WHALEBONE, SHELL, AMBER, MOTHER-OF-PEARL, MEERSCHAUM AND SUBSTITUTES FOR ALL THESE MATERIALS, OR OF PLASTICS, NAMELY, WOOD BEDSTEADS, WOOD BOXES, MATTRESSES MADE OF FLEXIBLE WOOD, CORKS, DRAWER PULLS, STOPPERS, BLINDS OF REED | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 024 | TEXTILES AND TEXTILE GOODS, NAMELY, TEXTILE NAPKINS, TEXTILE PLACE MATS, TEXTILE FABRICS FOR LINGERIE; BED COVERS, NAMELY, BED BLANKETS, BED LINEN, BED SHEETS, BED SKIRTS, BED SPREADS, DUVET COVERS; AND TABLE COVERS, NAMELY, TABLE LINEN, TABLE MATS NOT OF PAPER, FABRIC TABLE RUNNERS TABLE CLOTHS NOT OF PAPER | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, SHIRTS, PANTS, JACKETS; FOOTWEAR; AND HEADGEAR, NAMELY, HATS, CAPS | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 9, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 3, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 6, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 16, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 24, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 6, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 1, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 13, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 5, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 22, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 9, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 26, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 26, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 25, 2008 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |