Drawing for ARROGANCE

USPTO serial 79048294

ARROGANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3850137Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 21, 2010
Examiner
OKEKE, BENJAMIN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARROGANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leo M. Loughlin

Leo M. Loughlin Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, pc607 14th Street NWSuite 800Washington, DC 20005

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003BLEACHING PREPARATIONS AND OTHER SUBSTANCES FOR LAUNDRY USE, NAMELY, BLEACHING PREPARATIONS FOR HOUSEHOLD USE, LAUNDRY BLEACH, LAUNDRY DETERGENT; GENERAL PURPOSE CLEANING, POLISHING, SCOURING AND ABRASIVE LIQUIDS AND POWDERS; SOAPS; PERFUMERY; ESSENTIAL OILS; COSMETICS; HAIR LOTIONS; AND DENTIFRICESSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
009SCIENTIFIC, NAUTICAL, SURVEYING, PHOTOGRAPHIC, CINEMATOGRAPHIC, OPTICAL, WEIGHING, MEASURING, SIGNALING, CHECKING, SUPERVISION, LIFE-SAVING AND TEACHING APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, SENSING AND SIGNALING DEVICES FOR MEASUREMENT AND QUALITY CONTROL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING BY LASER, RECEIVERS FOR SATELLITES, SATELLITE AERIALS, SATELLITE DISHES, SATELLITE PROCESSORS, SATELLITES; APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR CONDUCTING, SWITCHING, TRANSFORMING, ACCUMULATING, REGULATING OR CONTROLLING ELECTRICITY, NAMELY, ELECTRIC RESISTERS, ELECTRICITY CONDUITS, ADAPTERS; APPARATUS FOR RECORDING, TRANSMISSION OR REPRODUCTION OF SOUND OR IMAGES; BLANK MAGNETIC DATA CARRIERS; BLANK RECORD DISCS; AUTOMATIC VENDING MACHINES AND MECHANISMS FOR COIN-OPERATED APPARATUS; CASH REGISTERS; CALCULATING MACHINES; DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, DATA PROCESSORS, CENTRAL PROCESSING UNITS FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION, DATA, SOUND OR IMAGES; COMPUTERS; FIRE-EXTINGUISHING APPARATUS; COMPUTER OPERATING PROGRAMS, RECORDEDSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
014PRECIOUS METALS AND THEIR ALLOYS; GOODS IN PRECIOUS METALS OR COATED THEREWITH AS JEWELRY, NAMELY, EARRINGS, BRACELETS, NECKLACES, RINGS, BROOCHES, CHAINS, KEY RINGS OF PRECIOUS METALS; JEWELRY AND PRECIOUS STONES; HOROLOGICAL AND CHRONOMETRIC INSTRUMENTSSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
018LEATHER AND IMITATIONS OF LEATHER; GOODS MADE OF LEATHER AND IMITATION LEATHER, NAMELY, BRIEFCASES, LEATHER AND IMITATION LEATHER BAGS, LEATHER FOR FURNITURE, LEATHER FOR SHOES, LEATHER HANDBAGS, LEATHER KEY CHAINS, LEATHER PURSES, LEATHER STRAPS, TRAVELING CASES OF LEATHER; ANIMAL SKINS AND HIDES; TRUNKS; TRAVELING BAGS; UMBRELLAS; PARASOLS; WALKING STICKS; WHIPS; HARNESSES AND SADDLERYSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
020FURNITURE, MIRRORS, PICTURE FRAMES; GOODS OF WOOD, CORK, REED, CANE, WICKER, HORN, BONE, IVORY, WHALEBONE, SHELL, AMBER, MOTHER-OF-PEARL, MEERSCHAUM AND SUBSTITUTES FOR ALL THESE MATERIALS, OR OF PLASTICS, NAMELY, WOOD BEDSTEADS, WOOD BOXES, MATTRESSES MADE OF FLEXIBLE WOOD, CORKS, DRAWER PULLS, STOPPERS, BLINDS OF REEDSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
024TEXTILES AND TEXTILE GOODS, NAMELY, TEXTILE NAPKINS, TEXTILE PLACE MATS, TEXTILE FABRICS FOR LINGERIE; BED COVERS, NAMELY, BED BLANKETS, BED LINEN, BED SHEETS, BED SKIRTS, BED SPREADS, DUVET COVERS; AND TABLE COVERS, NAMELY, TABLE LINEN, TABLE MATS NOT OF PAPER, FABRIC TABLE RUNNERS TABLE CLOTHS NOT OF PAPERSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
025CLOTHING, NAMELY, SHIRTS, PANTS, JACKETS; FOOTWEAR; AND HEADGEAR, NAMELY, HATS, CAPSSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 18, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
May 18, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 9, 2018INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 16, 2018INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 16, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Dec 28, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 28, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Sep 21, 2015REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 3, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 22, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 22, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 21, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 21, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 6, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 16, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 1, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 27, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 24, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 6, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 6, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 6, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 1, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2010ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 13, 2010PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jan 29, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 29, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 6, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 5, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 4, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 2, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 2, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 22, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 22, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 9, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 8, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 8, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 26, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 26, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 26, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 26, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 26, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 25, 2008NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 15, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 15, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 15, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 14, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 1, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance