USPTO serial 79048384
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
AROMA-BURSA MEYVE SULARI VE GIDA; SANAYI ANONIM SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by AROMA-BURSA MEYVE SULARI VE GIDA; SANAYI ANONIM SIRKETI
AROMA-BURSA MEYVE SULARI VE GIDA; SANAYI ANONIM SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by AROMA-BURSA MEYVE SULARI VE GIDA; SANAYI ANONIM SIRKETI
AROMA-BURSA MEYVE SULARI VE GIDA; SANAYI ANONIM SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by AROMA-BURSA MEYVE SULARI VE GIDA; SANAYI ANONIM SIRKETI
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Aimee L. Kaplan & Stewart J. Bellus
Aimee L. Kaplan & Stewart J. Bellus Collard & Roe, P.C.1077 Northern Blvd.Roslyn, NY 11576UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat, fish, poultry and game meat and processed meat; processed edible leguminous seeds; [ readymade soups; ] processed olives, olive paste; [ milk and milk products, excluding ice cream, ice milk, and frozen yogurt; ] milk products, namely, butter; [ edible vegetable oils; dried fruits and vegetables, canned fruits and vegetables, frozen fruits and vegetables, cooked fruits and vegetables; hazelnut and pistachio pastes; ] eggs, powdered dried eggs; processed bee pollen for human consumption for food purposes and not for medical purposes; potato chips | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Coffee, cocoa, coffee and cocoa based beverages, chocolate-based food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable based; [ pastry; ] honey; royal jelly for human consumption, propolis for human consumption; [ food flavorings; ] yeasts, baking powders; flour, processed semolina, food starch; granulated sugar, lump sugar, powdered sugar; [ tea, iced tea; confectionery, namely, bonbons, frozen confectionery, fondants and toffees; ] chocolates, biscuits, crackers, wafers; chewing gums [, ice cream, edible ice ]; salt; cereal and cereal products, namely, cereal for breakfast, cereal based snack food | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | Beers, preparation for making beer, namely, hops extracts; drinking water; mineral water, soda water, tonics in the nature of quinine waters; vegetable juices, fruit juices, fruit concentrates and extracts, namely, fruit juice concentrates, fruit concentrates used as ingredients of beverages, and non-alcoholic fruit extracts used in the preparation of beverages | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2014 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2013 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 14, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 10, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 7, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 5, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 22, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 19, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 17, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 16, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |