USPTO serial 79048400
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES V. COSTIGAN
James V. Costigan HEDMAN & COSTIGAN, P.C.1230 Avenue of the Americas, 7th FloorNew York, NY 10020UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | MACHINES, NAMELY, LATHES AND MACHINE TOOLS, NAMELY, MILLING CUTTERS; ELECTRIC DRILLS, AND MILLING MACHINES; INSTRUMENTS FOR MACHINE TOOLS, NAMELY, TOOL BITS, DIES FOR USE WITH MACHINE TOOLS; DRILL BITS AND MILLING ATTACHMENTS FOR POWER DRILLS; PARTS OF MACHINES, NAMELY, BLADES, BEARINGS; AND MACHINE TOOLS FOR REMOVING CHIPS, NAMELY, VACUUM CLEANERS | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 008 | HAND-OPERATED TOOLS, NAMELY, DIES, CLAMPS, HAMMERS, DRILLS AND CHISELS | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2018 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 4, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 19, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 19, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 4, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Apr 14, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 31, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 12, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 3, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 18, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 11, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 9, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 22, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 21, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |