Drawing for VISIO

USPTO serial 79048405

VISIO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAST, PAUL
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VISIO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Reading device for visually impaired people, comprising an image recording device, display screen readers, reading device for visually impaired people with integrated phone; Braille Displays; organizer with Braille elements; reading systems, consisting of an image capture device, a text recognition software and a voice outputSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 19, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 18, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 9, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 31, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 8, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 8, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 24, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 9, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 9, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 8, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 8, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 4, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 12, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 12, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 12, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 11, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 8, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance