USPTO serial 79048419
RHC ROUSSELOT HYDROLYZED COLLAGEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3512832Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 7, 2008
- Examiner
- STRUCK, ROBERT J
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RHC ROUSSELOT HYDROLYZED COLLAGEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeannine Rittenhouse
Jeannine Rittenhouse IpHorgan Ltd.1130 Lake Cook RoadSuite 240Buffalo Grove, IL 60089Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Collagen for industrial use, biochemical catalysts; chemical and biochemical additives for use in the manufacture of food, cosmetics, and pharmaceuticals, namely, natural and synthetic collagen | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 003 | Collagen for cosmetic purposes, namely, cosmetic creams; cosmetics containing collagen | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 005 | Collagen for pharmaceutical or medical use, or included in pharmaceutical or veterinary preparations, namely, collagen sold as an ingredient of pharmaceutical and veterinary preparations; dietetic preparations and substances, namely, high protein dietetic beverages and high protein dietetic foods for medical use or designed for a special diet, prepared with collagen; dietetic foods adapted for medical use; dietetic beverages for medical purposes or for a special diet, prepared with collagen, namely, nutritionally fortified beverages; food supplements for medical use or for a special diet, prepared with collagen | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 029 | Collagen for nutritional purposes, namely, unflavored and unsweetened gelatins; energy and nutrition food bars prepared with collagen, namely, processed fruit- and nut-based food bars | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Dietetic and dietary products for non-medical purposes, containing collagen, namely, confectionery products in the nature of pastilles, fruit jellies and confectionery chips for baking, biscuits and food preparations made with cereals in the nature of cereal based snack foods | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | Preparations for making beverages, namely, concentrates, syrups or powders used in the preparation of soft drinks; and non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages for dietary or energizing purposes, for non medical use, prepared with collagen | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SOBEL FRANCE S.A.S.
- Other trademarks owned by SOBEL FRANCE S.A.S.
- Other trademarks owned by SOBEL FRANCE S.A.S.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named RHC ROUSSELOT HYDROLYZED COLLAGEN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 8, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 8, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 4, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 4, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |