USPTO serial 79048452
STELTIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3683247Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 15, 2009
- Examiner
- DELGIZZI, RONALD ERNEST
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STELTIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NL
CH
CH-6072 SACHSELN, CH
CH-6072 SACHSELN, CH
CH-6072 SACHSELN, CH
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and software for Enterprise Resource Planning, Customer Relationship Management, Enterprise Performance Management, Financial Management, Governance Risk and Compliance Management, Human Capital Management, Master Data Management, Procurement, Project Management, Real Estate Management and Supply Chain Management; computer software for use in the area of support, transfer and hosting of Information Technology systems | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Business organization and business economic consultancy, namely, business consultancy related to automation; employment outplacement services; personnel placement and consultancy; business advice regarding economic effects provided by automation experts; information and advisory services regarding the aforementioned services | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Installation, repair and maintenance of apparatus, appliances and installations in the fields of computer automation, computer networks, data processing and telecommunication apparatus; installation of computer hardware, computer networks, and computer software; information and advisory services regarding the aforementioned services | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Workplace automation, information technology, and information communication technology design services in the field of computer network design for others, computer programming and software design, computer software development; management of computer network design projects; design, development, implementation, installation, and maintenance of software; advisory services and consultancy in the field of workplace automation; design, development and maintenance of websites; web hosting; design and development of networks; information and advisory services regarding the aforementioned services | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 045 | Licensing of intellectual property, namely, licensing related to hardware and software | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Steltix N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Axelion (Schweiz) GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by STELTIX Europe AG
- Other trademarks owned by STELTIX Europe AG
- Other trademarks owned by STELTIX Europe AG
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named STELTIX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 22, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 28, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 12, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 10, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 27, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 22, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2009 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 30, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 23, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 16, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |