USPTO serial 79048472
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Electric espresso machines and electric coffee machines | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | Household and kitchen utensils and containers, namely, graters, sieves, spatulas, strainers, turners, pot and pan scrapers, rolling pins, whisks, skimmers, peelers, can openers, corkscrews, bottle openers, squeezers, dustbins, dishwashing brushes, insulating flasks for beverages, thermally insulating containers for food, buckets, baskets, cooking pots, pans, deep fryers, machines for making ice cream, dishes, mixing machines, cauldrons, cooking molds, cookie cutters, basting spoons, salt and pepper pots, salt and pepper mills, lunch boxes, tableware, mugs, saucers, beaters, cutting boards, trays, pastry cutters, cutters, egg dishes, jars, pegs, corks, garlic presses, plates, gravy boats, cups, French presses; glassware, namely, beverageware, busts, desktop statuary, drawer pulls, figures, figurines, mugs, sculptures, statues, statuettes, works of art; earthenware, namely, beverageware, busts, desktop statuary, drawer pulls, figures, figurines, mugs, sculptures, statues, statuettes, works of art; porcelain, namely, beverageware, busts, desktop statuary, drawer pulls, figures, figurines, mugs, sculptures, statues statuettes, works of art | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Coffee, in particular espresso coffee, instant coffee and coffee substitutes made from barley, coffee-based beverages, cocoa, tea, sugar, rice, mustard, pepper, sauces, namely, curry sauces, garlic sauces, barbecue sauces, herb sauces, mustard sauces, yoghurt sauces, cheese sauces, cream sauces, chocolate sauces, vanilla sauces, vinegar and oil sauces, tomato sauces, vinegar, spices, cocoa beverages, ladyfingers, bread, pastry, pasta, noodles, pizza, confectionery, Italian ices, confectionery ices, ice candies, ice cubes, ice blocks and ice cream, water ice, sweets, in particular candy, chocolate and pralines | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | Beers; mineral and aerated waters, non-alcoholic beverages, namely, carbonated beverages, non-alcoholic beverages containing fruit juices, non-alcoholic beverages with tea flavor, non-alcoholic cocktails, non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages, non-alcoholic honey-based beverages, non-alcoholic malt beverages, non-alcoholic malt coolers, non-carbonated, non-alcoholic frozen flavored beverages, fruit drinks and fruit juices, syrups for making beverages, and preparations for making beverages, namely, fruit drinks | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 16, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 2, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 2, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 26, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 17, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 17, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 3, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 28, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 12, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 9, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 19, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |