Drawing for IPCOM

USPTO serial 79048529

IPCOM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IPCOM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ERIC G. KING

ERIC G. KING MILES & STOCKBRIDGE, P.C.1751 PINNACLE DRIVESUITE 500MCLEAN, VA 22 102-383

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
045EXPLOITATION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS, NAMELY, LICENSING OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTSSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 23, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 22, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 23, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 22, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 22, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 24, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 9, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 9, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 23, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 22, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 17, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 14, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 26, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 18, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 17, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 17, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 16, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 15, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 8, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance