USPTO serial 79048563
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
AROMA-BURSA MEYVE SULARI VE GIDA; SANAYI ANONIM SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by AROMA-BURSA MEYVE SULARI VE GIDA; SANAYI ANONIM SIRKETI
AROMA-BURSA MEYVE SULARI VE GIDA; SANAYI ANONIM SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by AROMA-BURSA MEYVE SULARI VE GIDA; SANAYI ANONIM SIRKETI
AROMA-BURSA MEYVE SULARI VE GIDA; SANAYI ANONIM SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by AROMA-BURSA MEYVE SULARI VE GIDA; SANAYI ANONIM SIRKETI
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
AIMEE L. KAPLAN
AIMEE L. KAPLAN COLLARD & ROE, P.C.1077 NORTHERN BLVD.ROSLYN, NY 11576UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | [ Meat, fish, poultry and game meat and processed meat; processed edible leguminous seeds; readymade soups; preserved and processed olives, olive paste; milk and milk products, excluding ice cream, ice milk, and frozen yogurt; milk products, namely, butter; edible vegetable oils; ] dried fruits and vegetables, canned fruits and vegetables, frozen fruits and vegetables, cooked fruits and vegetables [; hazelnut and pistachio pastes; eggs, powdered dried eggs; processed bee pollen for human consumption for food purposes and not for medical purposes; potato chips ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | [ Coffee, cocoa, coffee and cocoa based beverages, chocolate-based food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable based; pastry; honey; royal jelly for human consumption, propolis for human consumption; food flavorings; yeasts, baking powders; flour, processed semolina, food starch; granulated sugar, lump sugar, powdered sugar; tea, iced tea; confectionery, namely, bonbons, frozen confectionery, fondants and toffees; chocolates, biscuits, crackers, wafers; chewing gums, ice cream, edible ice; salt; cereal and cereal products, namely, cereal for breakfast, cereal based snack food ] | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
| 031 | Agricultural products, namely, seeds, flower seeds and vegetable seeds; horticultural products, namely, fresh fruit and vegetables; live animals in the nature of egg laying poultry; animal feed and additives for animal feed not for medical purposes, namely, additives for non-nutritional purposes for use as ingredient or filler | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | Beers, preparation for making beer, namely, hops extracts; drinking water; mineral water, soda water, tonics in the nature of quinine waters; vegetable juices, fruit juices, fruit concentrates and extracts, namely, fruit juice concentrates, fruit concentrates used as ingredients of beverages, and non-alcoholic fruit extracts used in the preparation of beverages | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 24, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2016 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2016 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 31, 2015 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2014 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2013 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 5, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 17, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 28, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 9, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 16, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |