Drawing for SÜRITETT PARADICSOM ARANYFÁCÁN

USPTO serial 79048624

SÜRITETT PARADICSOM ARANYFÁCÁN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3708768Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 10, 2009
Examiner
LAVACHE, ROBERT JAMES
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with SÜRITETT PARADICSOM ARANYFÁCÁN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Alumit

JOHN ALUMIT JOHN ALUMITALUMIT IP135 South Jackson Street, Suite 200Glendale, CA 91205

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Preserved, dried tomato; tomato purée, concentrated tomato juice for cookingACTIVE—
032[ Concentrated tomato juice ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 12, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2022ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 27, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2020INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Nov 18, 2020INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 18, 2020NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Mar 18, 202071AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Mar 18, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 8, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 12, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 23, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 26, 2017INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 8, 2017INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 8, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jan 18, 2017INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 18, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 18, 201671.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
May 17, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 24, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 29, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2010FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 8, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 8, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 10, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 10, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 25, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 6, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 5, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 23, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 14, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 13, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 13, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 9, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 9, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 9, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 8, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 8, 2009GAUNNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED—
Jul 8, 2009GAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED—
Jul 8, 2009NAUDREPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED—
Jun 8, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 7, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 21, 2009DCPNCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 11, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 11, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 11, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 19, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 19, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 19, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 6, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 6, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 6, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 18, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 18, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 14, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 21, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 21, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 21, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 20, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 8, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance