USPTO serial 79048629
VEGA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, TINA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VEGA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Games and playthings, namely, toy building blocks, building games, in-line roller skates, jigsaw puzzles, toy mobiles, playing balls, plush toys, radio-controlled toy vehicles, baby rattles, rocking horses, toy scooters, skateboards, scale model vehicles, theatrical masks, toy pistols, toy vehicles; decorations for Christmas trees | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 4, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 16, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 14, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 14, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 14, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 14, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 14, 2010 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 4, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 12, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2009 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2009 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 20, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 11, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 23, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |