Drawing for AMADEUS YOUR TECHNOLOGY PARTNER

USPTO serial 79048645

AMADEUS YOUR TECHNOLOGY PARTNER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3722443Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 8, 2009
Examiner
THOMAS, JULIE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AMADEUS YOUR TECHNOLOGY PARTNER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donald C. Lucas

Donald C. Lucas, Esq. Lucas & Mercanti, LLP30 Broad Street, 21st FloorNew York, NY 10004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGICAL SERVICES, NAMELY, TECHNICAL CONSULTING IN THE FIELD OF THE TRAVELS AND TOURISM INDUSTRY; RESEARCH AND DESIGN SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF THE TRAVELS AND TOURISM INDUSTRY; INDUSTRIAL ANALYSIS AND RESEARCH SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF THE TRAVELS AND TOURISM INDUSTRY; DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE, DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE INTENDED FOR TRAVEL AND TOURISM COMPANIESSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 14, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 9, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 9, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 21, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 26, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 13, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 3, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 9, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Dec 22, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 16, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 23, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 23, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 8, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 8, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 22, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 4, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 2, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 20, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 20, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 20, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 14, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 3, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 3, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 27, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 10, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 10, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 22, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 17, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 17, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 4, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 3, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 27, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 11, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 11, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 11, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 10, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 4, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2008CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Mar 21, 2008RINXUSPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 21, 2008CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 7, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance